NVS 510 vs Radeon RX Vega 10

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon RX Vega 10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon RX Vega 10 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 10 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 10 here:

Main Specs

  NVS 510 Radeon RX Vega 10
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 10 - in Laptops.
  • NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 10 - with Vega.
  • NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 10 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 7−8
ultra / 1080p 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 1−2 16−18
medium / 1080p 0−1 8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

  NVS 510 Radeon RX Vega 10
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name GK107 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Workstation Laptop
Release date 23 October 2012 26 October 2017
Pipelines 192 640
Core clock speed 797 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 12.75
Floating-point performance 306.0 gflops
Length 160 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 17 Mh/s
  Check Price Check Price