GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon RX Vega 11, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon RX Vega 11 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega 11
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 350% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Vega |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 64 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1240 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |