GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega 11
When comparing GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 11, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 11 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega 11
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega 11 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 11 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX250 and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX250 | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Vega |
| Code name | N17S-G2 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1240 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |