Quadro K1000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K1000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K1000M has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 350% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Fortnite is 250% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Quadro K1000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Quadro K1000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K1000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | N14P-Q1 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 192 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1240 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | - |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 10 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |