Quadro M1000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between Quadro M1000M and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB/4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro M1000M has 166% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- Quadro M1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- Quadro M1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M1000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Quadro M1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro M1000M and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 37% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro M1000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
| Code name | GM107 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | 1240 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.78 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,017 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |