Quadro M5000M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
In this comparison between Quadro M5000M and Radeon RX Vega 11 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro M5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 11 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX Vega 11
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro M5000M has 566% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega 11.
- Quadro M5000M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- Quadro M5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M5000M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- Quadro M5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Fortnite is 175% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M5000M in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. |
Full Specs
Quadro M5000M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
Code name | GM204 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1,536 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 962 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1051 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 93.60 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,995 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | - |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 366 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Quadro M5000M vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro M5000M vs GRID K240Q
- Quadro M5000M vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GRID K240Q
- Radeon RX Vega 11 vs Quadro K4000M