GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 3
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 3, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 3, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 3 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 3 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 3 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 3 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 3 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 3 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 3 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 3 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 3 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon RX Vega 3. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 3 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Code name | GF104 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |