GRID K260Q vs Radeon RX Vega 5
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon RX Vega 5, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 5, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon RX Vega 5 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 5 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 5 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega 5 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - with Vega.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and Radeon RX Vega 5 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 5. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega 5 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK104 | Vega |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Check Price |