Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon RX Vega 5

In this comparison between Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon RX Vega 5 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M385 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 5 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon RX Vega 5 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Radeon R9 M385 and Radeon RX Vega 5 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 or Radeon RX Vega 5 here:

Main Specs

  Radeon R9 M385 Radeon RX Vega 5
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • Radeon R9 M385 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - with Vega.
  • Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 5 - by 7 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 10−12 12−14
ultra / 1080p 6−7 8−9
QHD / 1440p 1−2 2−3
low / 720p 24−27 27−30
medium / 1080p 12−14 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 5 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M385.

Full Specs

  Radeon R9 M385 Radeon RX Vega 5
Architecture GCN Vega
Code name Strato Vega
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 16 June 2015 7 January 2020
Pipelines 896 320
Boost Clock 1100 MHz 1400 MHz
Transistor count 2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 7 nm
Texture fill rate 56.00
Floating-point performance 1,792 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 6.3
OpenGL 4.4
OpenCL Not Listed
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size medium sized
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
DualGraphics +
TrueAudio +
ZeroCore +
Switchable graphics +
Mantle +
  Check Price Check Price