Quadro P2000 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 56
When comparing Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro P2000 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro P2000 mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
210 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega 56 has 320% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon RX Vega 56 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
Quadro P2000 mobile is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 56 - in Desktops.
Quadro P2000 mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 56 - with Vega.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 mobile is 77 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega 56.
Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 mobile is 5208 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega 56.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
65−70
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
35−40
4K / 2160p
10−11
21−24
low / 720p
60−65
90−95
medium / 1080p
40−45
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 78% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
high / 1080p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
90−95
QHD / 1440p
35−40
70−75
4K / 2160p
18−20
40−45
low / 720p
100−110
150−160
medium / 1080p
60−65
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Battlefield 5 is 79% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
230−240
ultra / 1080p
180−190
−
QHD / 1440p
110−120
150−160
4K / 2160p
70−75
100−110
high / 768p
210−220
220−230
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
45−50
85−90
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
QHD / 1440p
27−30
55−60
4K / 2160p
14−16
30−35
low / 720p
80−85
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
high / 1080p
60−65
120−130
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
21−24
21−24
low / 720p
170−180
250−260
medium / 1080p
110−120
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Fortnite is 66% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
high / 1080p
60−65
110−120
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
QHD / 1440p
30−35
70−75
4K / 2160p
21−24
45−50
low / 720p
100−110
150−160
medium / 1080p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
140−150
170−180
medium / 768p
130−140
160−170
high / 1080p
70−75
120−130
ultra / 1080p
30−35
65−70
QHD / 1440p
21−24
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
high / 1080p
24−27
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−35
4K / 2160p
9−10
21−24
low / 720p
70−75
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Metro Exodus is 96% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
4K / 2160p
120−130
−
Quadro P2000 mobile and Radeon RX Vega 56 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
35−40
80−85
4K / 2160p
18−20
18−20
low / 720p
100−110
140−150
medium / 1080p
55−60
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
high / 1080p
24−27
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
6−7
27−30
4K / 2160p
2−3
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 103% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
130−140
240−250
medium / 768p
85−90
170−180
high / 1080p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
low / 768p
110−120
180−190
medium / 768p
70−75
−
ultra / 1080p
55−60
90−95
high / 768p
65−70
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 56 in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Quadro P2000 mobile.
Full Specs
Quadro P2000 mobile
Radeon RX Vega 56
Architecture
Pascal
Vega
Code name
GP107GL
Vega
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
5 July 2017
14 August 2017
Pipelines
768
3584
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
1138 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1474 MHz
Transistor count
3,300 million
12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
77.14
329.5
Floating-point performance
10,566 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
409.6 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.13 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.125
CUDA
6.1
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
28.5 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price