GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 760A

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 Check Price

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	10−11
ultra / 1080p	1−2	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	6−7	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	8−9	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	170−180
medium / 768p	100−110	140−150
ultra / 1080p	45−50	70−75
QHD / 1440p	24−27	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	4−5	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	27−30
medium / 1080p	6−7	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	60−65	75−80
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	50−55	65−70
medium / 768p	−	55−60
high / 1080p	9−10	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	2−3	6−7
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	8−9	18−20
medium / 1080p	4−5	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
high / 1080p	70−75	−
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	8−9	18−20
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	18−20	35−40
medium / 768p	12−14	21−24
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	50−55
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 760A.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 760A	Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
Architecture	Kepler	Vega
Code name	GK106	Vega Raven Ridge
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 March 2014	7 January 2018
Pipelines	768	384
Core clock speed	628 MHz
Boost Clock	657 MHz	1100 MHz
Transistor count	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	42.05
Floating-point performance	1,009 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64.13 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000

Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares