Quadro 500M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000
When comparing Quadro 500M and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 500M and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 500M
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 342% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 193% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 250% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Quadro 500M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Quadro 500M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
Code name | GF108 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 500M vs GeForce 820A
- Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M340
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce 820A
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Radeon R7 M340
- Quadro 500M vs Quadro K4000M
- Quadro 500M vs FirePro M5100
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K4000M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs FirePro M5100