GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 289% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 331% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 188% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 318% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 | |
Architecture | Turing | Vega |
Code name | TU117 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | DirectX 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 675M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 vs GeForce GTX 675M
- Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580