GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 6

In this comparison between GeForce GT 650M and Radeon RX Vega 6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 650M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GT 650M and Radeon RX Vega 6 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GT 650M and Radeon RX Vega 6 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M or Radeon RX Vega 6 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GT 650M Radeon RX Vega 6
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type DDR3\GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • GeForce GT 650M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 - with Vega.
  • GeForce GT 650M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 3−4 3−4
ultra / 1080p 1−2 1−2
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 14−16 14−16
medium / 1080p 5−6 5−6
GeForce GT 650M and Radeon RX Vega 6 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

Full Specs

  GeForce GT 650M Radeon RX Vega 6
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name N13E-GE Vega Raven Ridge
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 22 March 2012 7 January 2018
Pipelines 384 384
Boost Clock 900 MHz 1100 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Floating-point performance 652.8 gflops
Memory bus width 128bit
Memory clock speed 1800 - 4000 MHz
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 API DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.5
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +
CUDA cores 384
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 21 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price