GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 7
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 7 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 7 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 7 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 7 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Fortnite is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 7 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
| Code name | GF104 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 7 January 2020 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |