GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 289% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 331% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 180% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 318% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Turing | Vega |
Code name | TU117 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | DirectX 12_1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce MX150
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q