GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Vega |
Code name | GF104 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce MX150
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q