GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Vega |
Code name | GM107 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce MX150
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q