GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
When choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K280Q and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000.
GRID K280Q
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- GRID K280Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K280Q and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 24% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
| Code name | GK104 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |