Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
In this comparison between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R5 430 OEM will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - with Vega.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Fortnite is 83% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Oland | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 June 2016 | 26 October 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs UHD Graphics 620
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GRID K280Q
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000 vs GRID K280Q