FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Tahiti | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M