GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - with Vega.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 - by 7 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Dota 2 is 103% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Fortnite is 237% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Minecraft is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 380% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 471% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200 | Vega Raven Ridge |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 January 2020 |
Pipelines | 240 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1750 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 7 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
- Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000 vs GeForce GTX 780M