GeForce GTX 760M vs Radeon RX Vega 8

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 8 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 8 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 8 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 8 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 760M or Radeon RX Vega 8 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 760M Radeon RX Vega 8
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Both cards are used in Laptops.
  • GeForce GTX 760M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 8 - with Vega.
  • GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 8 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 7−8 8−9
ultra / 1080p 4−5 5−6
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 18−20 18−20
medium / 1080p 9−10 10−11
GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon RX Vega 8 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 760M Radeon RX Vega 8
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name N14E-GL Vega Raven Ridge
Type Laptop Laptop
Release date 30 May 2013 26 October 2017
Pipelines 768 512
Core clock speed 657 MHz
Boost Clock 657 MHz 1200 MHz
Transistor count 2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 42.05
Floating-point performance 1,009 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 64.0 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 API DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.5
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +
CUDA cores 768
Bus support PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
SLI options +
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 54 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Standard memory configuration GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection +
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI +
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming +
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder +
Optimus +
Blu-Ray 3D Support +
3D Vision / 3DTV Play +
  Check Price Check Price