Quadro 2000D vs Radeon RX Vega 9

In this comparison between Quadro 2000D and Radeon RX Vega 9 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000D will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 9 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Radeon RX Vega 9 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon RX Vega 9 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 9 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro 2000D Radeon RX Vega 9
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI
  Check Price
  • Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - with Vega.
  • Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 2−3 12−14
ultra / 1080p 0−1 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
low / 720p 12−14 27−30
medium / 1080p 3−4 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 9 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Quadro 2000D.

Full Specs

  Quadro 2000D Radeon RX Vega 9
Architecture Fermi Vega
Code name GF106 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Workstation Laptop
Release date 5 October 2011 26 October 2017
Pipelines 192 576
Core clock speed 625 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz
Transistor count 1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 20.00
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops
Length 178 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth 41.6 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.1
Vulkan N/A
CUDA 2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 31 Mh/s
  Check Price