Quadro K1000M vs Radeon RX Vega 9

In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Radeon RX Vega 9 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega 9 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K1000M and Radeon RX Vega 9 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon RX Vega 9 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon RX Vega 9 here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K1000M Radeon RX Vega 9
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type DDR3
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - in Laptops.
  • Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - with Vega.
  • Quadro K1000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 12−14
ultra / 1080p 8−9
QHD / 1440p 0−1 2−3
low / 720p 1−2 27−30
medium / 1080p 0−1 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 9 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K1000M Radeon RX Vega 9
Architecture Kepler Vega
Code name N14P-Q1 Vega Raven Ridge
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Release date 1 June 2012 26 October 2017
Pipelines 192 576
Core clock speed 850 MHz
Boost Clock 1300 MHz
Transistor count 1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 13.60
Floating-point performance 326.4 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 12 (11_0) DirectX 12_1
Shader Model 5.1
OpenGL 4.6
OpenCL 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s
Laptop size medium sized
Optimus +
  Check Price Check Price