GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega M GH you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GH will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 284 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2408 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GF114 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q