GRID K260Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon RX Vega M GH you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GH will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 318 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK104 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 6970
- GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 6990
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Radeon HD 6970
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Radeon HD 6990
- GRID K260Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- GRID K260Q vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q