HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
In this comparison between HD Graphics 630 and Radeon RX Vega M GH you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics 630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GH will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics 630
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega M GH has 566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 60 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- HD Graphics 630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 763 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 and Radeon RX Vega M GH are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 112% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 357% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 55% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 71% more, than HD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Vega |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 January 2017 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 24 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- HD Graphics 630 vs HD Graphics P630
- HD Graphics 630 vs FirePro W4190M
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs HD Graphics P630
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs FirePro W4190M
- HD Graphics 630 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q