Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GH. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GH. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro FX 3800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 8% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 463 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GH is 1600 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 180% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 1866% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 552% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 1200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 468% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 6600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3250% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2933% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 97% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Vega |
Code name | GT200B | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q