Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon RX Vega M GH stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is connected by IGP, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is build with Vega architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 489 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1388 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX Vega M GH and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Fortnite is 89% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GH in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Vega | Fermi |
Code name | Vega Kaby Lake-G | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1063 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 3,656 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 590
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost