GRID K260Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL 870
In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 is 186 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL 870 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK104 | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |