FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 438% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 31 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4100 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 22 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |