FirePro S9050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 31 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 4100 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−12
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro S9050 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
65−70
4K / 2160p
45−50
35−40
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 4.0
Code name
Tahiti
Polaris 22
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
1 February 2018
Pipelines
1792
1280
Core clock speed
900 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
80.88
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2,588 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
