FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 130% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 306 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 586 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 320% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 311% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 360% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 182% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 236% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 22 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Check Price |