GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 146% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 152 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 2608 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GF114 | Polaris 22 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon RX 560X
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Tesla C2050
- Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Radeon RX 560X
- Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Tesla C2050