GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 106% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 49 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 1394 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
100−110
QHD / 1440p
60−65
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Code name
GK106
Polaris 22
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
26 March 2013
1 February 2018
Pipelines
768
1280
Core clock speed
980 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
80.88
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
2,588 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
192 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
