GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 750 Ti stacks up against Radeon RX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 89 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 1395 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
24−27
QHD / 1440p
10−12
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
200−210
190−200
ultra / 1080p
120−130
100−110
QHD / 1440p
90−95
65−70
4K / 2160p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
80−85
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
30−35
30−33
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
medium / 768p
90−95
85−90
high / 1080p
40−45
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
40−45
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Code name
GM107
Polaris 22
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
18 February 2014
1 February 2018
Pipelines
640
1280
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
80.88
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
2,588 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
