GeForce GTX 860M SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M SLI or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
120 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
IGP
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2x 4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 860M SLI has 84% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M SLI.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 98 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTX 860M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M SLI is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
21−24
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
QHD / 1440p
8−9
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 27% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
24−27
QHD / 1440p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 860M SLI and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
220−230
medium / 768p
210−220
190−200
ultra / 1080p
130−140
100−110
QHD / 1440p
100−110
65−70
4K / 2160p
55−60
35−40
high / 768p
170−180
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
85−90
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
21−24
18−20
4K / 2160p
9−10
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−33
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
35−40
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
80−85
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
35−40
30−33
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−12
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
110−120
95−100
medium / 768p
100−105
85−90
high / 1080p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
QHD / 1440p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
2−3
low / 720p
45−50
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
medium / 768p
50−55
40−45
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M SLI
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Code name
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
12 March 2014
1 February 2018
Pipelines
1280
1280
Core clock speed
1029 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
2x 1870 Million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
80.88
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
2x 128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
CUDA
+
SLI options
+
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
