GeForce MX350 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
20 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 225% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
GeForce MX350 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 423 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce MX350 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 5600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−105
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 9% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
9−10
10−12
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
30−33
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
30−33
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce MX350.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
65−70
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
18−20
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce MX350.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Full Specs
GeForce MX350
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Code name
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
20 February 2020
1 February 2018
Pipelines
640
1280
Core clock speed
1354 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
3,300 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
29.98
80.88
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
64 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
CUDA
6.1
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price