GRID K140Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | DDR3 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID K140Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GRID K140Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 81 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GRID K140Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K140Q is 382 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 300% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 571% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 82% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | Polaris 22 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |