GRID K220Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between GRID K220Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GRID K220Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 186 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 253% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 22 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 1 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |