GRID K520 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K520 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega M GL, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- GRID K520 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 186 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GRID K520 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GRID K520 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 22 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 1 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 80.88 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |