GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 374 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3612 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 8Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 22 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Check Price |