Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
IGP
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 631 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
220−230
medium / 768p
80−85
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 185% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 281% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
2−3
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
GCN 4.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
10 July 2019
1 February 2018
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
80.88
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price