Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
IGP
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 333% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 631 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 105% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
150−160
220−230
medium / 768p
120−130
190−200
ultra / 1080p
60−65
100−110
QHD / 1440p
35−40
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
90−95
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
65−70
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 49% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
110−120
medium / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 83% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
30−33
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
10−12
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
60−65
medium / 768p
20−22
40−45
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 93% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
GCN 4.0
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
3 January 2017
1 February 2018
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
80.88
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price