Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 66% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Quadro FX 3800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 331 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 3800 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 106% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 82% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Polaris 22 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Check Price |