Quadro K2000M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K2000M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
IGP
Memory type
DDR3
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 18% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 186 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
100−110
QHD / 1440p
21−24
65−70
4K / 2160p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
10−12
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
10−12
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
30−33
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
60−65
medium / 768p
8−9
40−45
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Code name
N14P-Q3
Polaris 22
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
1 February 2018
Pipelines
384
1280
Core clock speed
745 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
80.88
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price