Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Quadro T1000
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 30% more power consumption, than Quadro T1000.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 464 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 6600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Quadro T1000 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro T1000 | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Polaris 22 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 May 2019 | 1 February 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 931 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 1011 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 80.88 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Check Price |