Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 65 Watt.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 151 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon RX Vega M GL are manufactured by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
190−200
220−230
medium / 768p
160−170
190−200
ultra / 1080p
85−90
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
35−40
high / 768p
120−130
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
85−90
100−110
ultra / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−35
45−50
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
90−95
110−120
medium / 1080p
45−50
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
30−33
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−12
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
65−70
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
35−40
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
8−9
10−12
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
60−65
medium / 768p
27−30
40−45
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
Polaris
GCN 4.0
Code name
Polaris 12
Polaris 22
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
26 September 2019
1 February 2018
Pipelines
640
1280
Core clock speed
1082 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
41.44
80.88
Floating-point performance
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price