Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is connected by IGP, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 357 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1732 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 208% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 222% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Polaris 22 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Check Price |